Sahayata & Sahayata

Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) provides inherent powers to the court to make orders necessary to meet the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the court's process. This provision recognizes the authority of the court to act beyond the rules of the CPC if required for fair and efficient resolution of cases. Key Concepts of Section 151 CPC: Inherent Powers of the Court : Section 151 allows courts to use their inherent power when specific provisions in the CPC do not cover a situation, enabling them to ensure justice. The exercise of this power is intended for the ends of justice and to prevent the abuse of process. Courts must ensure that their procedures do not lead to injustice. Preventing Abuse of Process : Section 151 can be used to prevent misuse or abuse of the judicial process by either the parties involved or even through procedural errors by the court itself. It is based on the principle “actus curiae neminem gravabit” (an act of the court shall preju...

The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, is a cornerstone of Indian civil law, providing the framework for the conduct of civil litigation in India. It consolidates and amends the laws relating to the procedure of civil courts, ensuring justice is delivered efficiently and fairly. In this post, we summarize the key concepts under CPC to help you master the essentials of civil litigation. 1. Jurisdiction of Courts Sections 9 to 21 deal with the jurisdiction of courts, including provisions about the types of civil suits that courts can try, conditions under which they can stay proceedings, and objections to jurisdiction. Sections 15-20 specifically address the appropriate court in which to institute a suit, considering factors like subject matter and residence of the defendant. 2. Res Judicata and Bar to Further Suit Section 11 provides the principle of res judicata , meaning no court shall try a suit or issue that has already been decided by a competent court. This doctrine ensures t...

Here is a detailed list of various provisions under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, where applications can be made to the court: 1. Applications Under Preliminary Part Section 5 : Application of the Code to Revenue Courts. Applications can be made to apply certain provisions to revenue courts. 2. Applications Related to Suits in General Section 10 : Stay of Suit - Application can be made to stay the proceedings if another suit is pending. Section 24 : General Power of Transfer and Withdrawal - Application for transferring a suit from one court to another. Order II, Rule 2 : Application for joining multiple claims in one suit or for relinquishing part of a claim. Order VI, Rule 17 : Application for amendment of pleadings. 3. Institution of Suits Order IV, Rule 1 : Suit must be commenced by submitting a plaint. An application can be made for this purpose. Order VII, Rule 10A : Application for the fixing of a date of appearance after the return of a plaint. 4. Appearance of Parties Ord...

The Negotiable Instruments Act , originally enacted in 1881, governs promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques, classifying them as negotiable instruments. The Act is a codification of English law, with minor deviations to suit Indian contexts and business practices. Over time, significant amendments have been introduced, especially with respect to the dishonor of cheques, which is a central concern in commercial transactions. Key Features of the Act: Definition of Negotiable Instruments : A negotiable instrument is a document guaranteeing the payment of a specific amount of money, either on demand or at a set time. It includes: Promissory Notes : A written promise to pay a certain sum of money. Bills of Exchange : A written order directing someone to pay a specific sum. Cheques : A bill of exchange drawn on a banker, payable on demand. Objective of the Act : The Act aims to encourage and facilitate commerce by allowing instruments like cheques to act as substitutes ...

In the Supreme Court judgment Rajesh Mitra @ Rajesh Kumar Mitra vs. Karnani Properties Limited dated September 20, 2024, the key legal issue revolved around the interpretation of tenant rights under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act of 1956 (referred to as the "Old Act") and the 1997 Act (referred to as the "New Act"). The case addressed whether the legal heirs of a tenant who inherited tenancy under the Old Act were subject to eviction after the enforcement of the New Act, particularly under the provisions of Section 2(g) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. Case Background: Original Tenancy : The premises in question were originally let out to S.K. Mitra. After his death in 1970, his legal heirs, including his wife and children (appellants), inherited the tenancy under Section 2(h) of the 1956 Act, which allowed the tenancy to devolve to legal heirs residing with the tenant at the time of death. New Tenancy Law : The 1997 Act, which came into force o...