Landmark Judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court: District Judge Civil Judge APO and APP ADPO Preparation


1.JUstice K S  Puttaswamy( Retd.) Vs Union of India (2017) 9 JB-held that aadhar not only gave them a unique identity but also a life dignity.: 

2.Right to Privacy as Fundamental right  Social morality also changes form age to age: NALSA Vs UOI

3.Hon'ble Supreme Court is the guardian of Rule of Law: Bejoy Kumar Mohanty Vs Jadu

 4.Collective Responsibility- art 75

5.     Trans-gender persons to be persons of the Third gender: National Legal Services Authority Vs UOI

6.       S R Bommai vs UOI: Constitution of India is Federal

7.       Indra Swaheny Vs UOI Cannot be reservation in promotion

8.       Carry forward rule was held to be ultra Vires: Devadasan Vs UOI

9.       Rajeev Kumar Gupta Vs UOI (2016): Persons with disability

10.   499 and 500 of IPC is Constitutional Subramanium Swami Vs UOI

11.   Fundamental duties must be used as a tool to control state action drifting from constitutional value: AIIMS Students Union Vs AIIMS

12.   Keshav Singh: Parliamentary Privileges

13.   Discretionary powers of Governor under Article 163 of the Constitution were held subject to judicial review: Naban Rabia and Baman Felix Vs Deputy Speaker

14.   The amendment in the constitution is the exercise of the legislative function of the Parliament: Golaknath Vs State of Punjab

15.   Courts are flooded with a large number of PILS, so it is desirable for courts to filter out frivolous petition and dismiss them with cost: Holicow pictures Pvt Ltd Vs Premchandra Mishra  

16.   Indian Constitution is Federal as much as it establishes what may be called as dual polity: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

17.   Power of the president of India to issue an ordinance is a legislative power

18.   Triple Talaq unconstitutional: Shayara bano Vs UOI and Gulshan Parveen Vs UOI

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advocate Amendment Bill 2025: Key Reforms and Implications for the Legal Profession"

Anathula Sudhakar vs P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By LRs & Ors on 25 March, 2008 Judgment Detailed Summary