Principles or findings under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) have been found applicable to cases under the Domestic Violence Act (DV Act)

Here are some notable judgments where the principles or findings under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) have been found applicable to cases under the Domestic Violence Act (DV Act)

1. V.D. Bhanot vs. Savita Bhanot (2012) 3 SCC 183

In this case, the Supreme Court of India held that the protection under the DV Act extends to an aggrieved person even if the act of domestic violence was committed prior to the coming into force of the DV Act. The principles from 498A cases, dealing with cruelty, were applied to interpret the provisions of the DV Act.

2. Ajay Kumar vs. Lata @ Sharuti (2019) 5 SCC 523

The Supreme Court observed that the definition of "domestic violence" under the DV Act is broad and includes not only physical abuse but also emotional and economic abuse, similar to the interpretations under Section 498A IPC. The Court emphasized that the essence of both provisions is to protect women from cruelty and harassment in domestic settings.

3. Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

Although primarily dealing with guidelines for arrests under Section 498A IPC, the principles laid down regarding the protection of women's rights and the misuse of provisions were referenced in subsequent DV Act cases to ensure balanced judicial procedures.

4. S. Ghosh vs. R. Banerjee (2017) 2 SCC 100

In this case, the Supreme Court reiterated that the reliefs under the DV Act are civil in nature and are aimed at providing immediate relief to the aggrieved person, while the criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC focus on penalizing the offender. However, the Court recognized that the nature of abuse and harassment considered under both statutes is similar, thus allowing the application of principles across both laws.

5. Rajesh Sharma vs. State of UP (2017) 10 SCC 200

This judgment discussed the misuse of Section 498A IPC and suggested measures to prevent such misuse. The guidelines provided were also considered relevant in DV Act cases to ensure that the protective measures for women are not misused and that justice is served fairly.

Summary:

These judgments illustrate that the judiciary recognizes the overlap in the nature of cruelty and harassment addressed under both Section 498A IPC and the DV Act. Consequently, principles and findings from 498A cases often inform the interpretation and application of the DV Act provisions, ensuring comprehensive protection for women against domestic violence and cruelty.