Welcome to Sahayata & Sahayata: Your Resource for Legal Learning with Writing and Judicial Services Preparation
At Sahayata & Sahayata, we are dedicated to empowering individuals who are passionate about the law, the judiciary, and legal writing. Whether you're an aspiring law student, a judicial services aspirant, or simply someone keen on understanding the intricacies of the legal system, our blog is the place for you.
Our Mission:
Landmark Judgment on Permanent Alimony, Maintenance, and Divorce Settlement under Hindu Marriage Act" #Matrimonial Dispute
A crucial question arises: Can the right to mesne profits be attached in execution of a decree? Yes, the right to mesne profits can be attached and executed under Order 21, Rule 42 of CPC. If a decree is passed for possession along with mesne profits, the decree-holder can apply for execution to recover the mesne profits. However, if mesne profits are unascertained , a separate inquiry under Order 20, Rule 12 of CPC is required to determine the exact amount before execution.
Brief Outline & Bird’s Eye View of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 Objective: This Act provides a comprehensive legal framework for the protection, care, rehabilitation, and justice for children, particularly those in conflict with the law and those in need of care and protection. It aligns with international standards, including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Bird’s Eye View (Key Highlights) Focus on Rehabilitation Over Punishment – Emphasizes reformation and social reintegration of children. Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) – Handles cases of children in conflict with law (juvenile offenders). Child Welfare Committee (CWC) – Looks after children in need of care and protection. Age-based Classification – Below 16 years – Always treated as juveniles. 16–18 years (heinous crimes) – Subject to preliminary assessment and can be tried as adults if necessary. Institutionalization as a Last Resort – Prefe...
Topic-wise test series on the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 to help you prepare for the Judicial Services Preliminary Examination . 🔍 Topic-Wise MCQs on Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 📌 Topic 1: Relevancy of Facts (Sections 3-50) A is accused of bribing a government official. The prosecution introduces evidence that A had previously bribed another official. Is this admissible? a) Yes, because it establishes a pattern of behavior b) No, because prior misconduct is not relevant c) Yes, but only if the previous act was prosecuted d) No, because character evidence is inadmissible ✅ Answer: a) Yes, because it establishes a pattern of behavior 🔹 Explanation: Under Section 13 , prior similar incidents may be relevant if they help prove whether an act was accidental or intentional. A is on trial for theft. The prosecution presents evidence that A was caught committing a similar theft a year ago. Is this admissible? a) ...
Comments
Post a Comment