Sahayata & Sahayata

Title: Neeraj Kainth v. M/S Campuseai India Pvt Ltd & Ors. Court: High Court of Delhi Decision Date: December 20, 2024 Judge: Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora Executive Summary The Delhi High Court recently clarified the boundaries of impleading company directors in civil suits . The Court ruled that directors cannot be made personal parties to a lawsuit unless there is a specific cause of action, a personal guarantee, or a clear case for "lifting the corporate veil" . 1. Background: The Dispute The plaintiff, a former CEO, filed a suit for: Unpaid salary and travel reimbursements against Defendants 1 and 2 (the companies) . Share allotments against Defendants 3 and 4 (sister concerns) . Personal Impleadment: The plaintiff also sued Defendants 5 and 6 in their personal capacity, alleging they were the "chief controllers" and decision-makers of the corporate entities . 2. The Legal Tug-of-War The Directors' Defense: Defendants 5 and 6 ...

  Case Brief: Namita Gupta vs. Suraj Holdings Limited Title: Namita Gupta v. Suraj Holdings Limited , CM(M) 457/2023 Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi Decided On: January 9, 2024 Judge: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla Facts of the Case Original Suit: The respondent (plaintiff) filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,07,37,545.07 against the petitioner (defendant) in August 2019 . Procedural History: Initially treated as an ordinary civil suit, the petitioner filed a written statement and a counter-claim . In February 2022, the petitioner moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC , arguing the dispute was commercial and barred for non-compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation (Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act) . Lower Court Orders: The Additional District Judge (ADJ) observed the dispute was commercial and sent the file to the Principal District and Sessions Judge (PDSJ) for transfer . The PDSJ subsequently transferred the suit to the Commercial Court...