Whether the agreement to sell should be treated as a conveyance for the purpose of stamp duty? SC
Summary of Key Points from the Judgment (Civil Appeal No. 2549 of 2025):
Case Title: Ramesh Mishrimal Jain vs. Avinash Vishwanath Patne & Anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judgment Date: 14th February 2025
Background:
- The dispute arose from an agreement to sell dated 03.09.2003 related to a property in Paiki Village, Khed Taluk.
- Appellant (Ramesh Jain) filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement.
- Respondents claimed deficit stamp duty and penalty on the agreement.
- The Trial Court impounded the document and directed it to the Registrar of Stamps for recovery of stamp duty and penalty.
- The Bombay High Court upheld this decision in Writ Petition No. 3246 of 2016.
Key Legal Issues:
- Whether the agreement to sell should be treated as a conveyance for the purpose of stamp duty.
- Applicability of Explanation I to Article 25 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.
- Whether possession of the property was transferred or agreed to be transferred before execution of the sale deed.
Appellant’s Arguments:
- Possession remained with the appellant in his capacity as a tenant, distinct from ownership.
- No immediate or agreed transfer of ownership possession until execution of the sale deed.
- Therefore, the agreement to sell was not a conveyance and did not attract stamp duty as a conveyance.
Respondents’ Arguments:
- The agreement constituted a "deemed conveyance" under Explanation I to Article 25.
- Possession was agreed to be transferred within 11 months of the agreement.
- Supported by precedents: Veena Hasmukh Jain vs. State of Maharashtra (1999) and Shyamsundar Radheshyam Agrawal vs. Pushpabai Nilkanth Patil (2024).
Supreme Court’s Ruling:
- The agreement evidenced delivery of possession, satisfying the definition of "conveyance" under the Bombay Stamp Act.
- Stamp duty is levied on the instrument, not the transaction.
- Confirmed the lower courts’ decision to impound the document and recover deficit stamp duty and penalty.
- Clarified that any stamp duty already paid would be adjusted against the total duty on execution of the sale deed, with penalties calculated from the date of the agreement.
Final Outcome:
- Appeal dismissed with no costs.
- Directions given for deduction of already paid stamp duty when the final conveyance is executed.
Comments
Post a Comment