The Supreme Court of India, in Rajnesh v. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324, issued comprehensive guidelines to streamline maintenance proceedings across various statutes, ensuring timely disposal and preventing conflicting orders due to overlapping jurisdictions

 The Supreme Court of India, in Rajnesh v. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324, issued comprehensive guidelines to streamline maintenance proceedings across various statutes, ensuring timely disposal and preventing conflicting orders due to overlapping jurisdictions.

Key Overarching Principles

• Social Justice Objective: Maintenance is a measure of social justice intended to prevent wives and children from destitution and vagrancy, as envisioned under Articles 15(3) and 39 of the Constitution.

• Overlapping Statutes: A wife can simultaneously claim maintenance under different laws, such as Section 125 CrPC, the Domestic Violence (DV) Act, 2005, and the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA), 1955.

• No Straitjacket Formula: Quantum determination is based on the financial status of the parties and the standard of living enjoyed in the matrimonial home; it must be realistic—neither oppressive for the husband nor meagre for the wife.

---

Mandatory Guidelines (issued under Article 142)

1. Issue of Overlapping Jurisdiction

• Mandatory Disclosure: Applicants must disclose all previously instituted maintenance proceedings and any orders passed therein in every subsequent application.

• Adjustment/Set-off: While deciding subsequent claims, the court must consider maintenance already awarded in previous proceedings and allow for an adjustment or set-off of the amount.

• Modification: Any request to vary or modify a previous order must be made to the same court that passed it.

2. Payment of Interim Maintenance

• Affidavit of Disclosure: Both parties must file an "Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities" in all maintenance proceedings, including pending ones.

• Timeline: The respondent must submit a reply with their affidavit within a maximum of four weeks.

• Disposal: Courts should endeavour to decide interim maintenance applications by a reasoned order within four to six months after the affidavits are filed.

• Striking Off Defence: If a respondent willfully delays proceedings or fails to file the affidavit, the court may strike off their defence as a last resort.

3. Criteria for Determining Quantum

Factors to be considered include:

• Standard of Living: The income must be sufficient to maintain the standard of living the applicant was accustomed to in the matrimonial home.

• Sacrificed Career: Courts must consider if the wife sacrificed her own employment opportunities for child-rearing or family care.

• Husband's Obligation: An able-bodied husband is presumed capable of earning to maintain his family; he cannot plead a lack of income to avoid his moral duty.

• Child Support: Living expenses of children, including reasonable costs for education, vocational training, and extra coaching, must be factored in.

4. Date from which Maintenance is Awarded

• Date of Application: To bring uniformity across all statutes (HMA, HAMA, DV Act, and CrPC), maintenance shall be awarded from the date of filing the application for maintenance.

5. Enforcement of Orders

• Manner of Enforcement: Orders may be enforced as a money decree of a civil court under the CPC (civil detention, attachment of property) or as provided under Section 125(3) CrPC (imprisonment for non-payment).