English Grammar with Practice MCQs – Rajasthan Judiciary Prelims 2025

-

English Grammar with Practice MCQs – Rajasthan Judiciary Prelims 2025

1. Tenses

  • Present Perfect: He has filed the suit.

  • Past Perfect: She had signed the contract.

MCQ: Which sentence is in present perfect tense?
(a) He files the case.
(b) He filed the case.
(c) He has filed the case.
(d) He had filed the case.

Answer: (c)

2. Articles

  • Usage: a/an/the

  • Before courts: The High Court, The Supreme Court

MCQ: Identify the correct usage:
(a) He is an honest man.
(b) He is a honest man.
(c) He is the honest man.
(d) He is honest man.

Answer: (a)

3. Active & Passive Voice

  • Active: The judge passed the order.

  • Passive: The order was passed by the judge.

MCQ: Choose the passive voice:
(a) The judge will hear the case.
(b) The case is hearing.
(c) The case will be heard by the judge.
(d) The case was to hear.

Answer: (c)

4. Direct & Indirect Speech

  • Direct: She said, \u201cI am filing the affidavit.\u201d

  • Indirect: She said that she was filing the affidavit.

MCQ: Convert to indirect: He said, \u201cI know the law.\u201d
(a) He said that he knew the law.
(b) He says that he knows the law.
(c) He said that he knows the law.
(d) He said to know the law.

Answer: (a)

5. Modals

  • Must = Compulsion

  • Should = Advice

  • May = Permission or Possibility

MCQ: Which modal indicates advice?
(a) Must
(b) Should
(c) May
(d) Might

Answer: (b)

6. Vocabulary

  • Synonym of Guilty: Culpable

  • Antonym of Victory: Defeat

MCQ: Choose the correct synonym for 'Accused':
(a) Witness
(b) Victim
(c) Defendant
(d) Judge

Answer: (c)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Important sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) along with key points:

-
Important sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) along with key points: Chapter-wise Important Sections of BNS, 2023 General Principles & Definitions Section 1 – Short title, extent, and commencement Section 2 – Definitions (similar to IPC, but some terms updated) Section 3 – Punishment of offenses committed beyond India but by Indian citizens General Exceptions (Defense to Criminal Liability) Section 20 – Act done by a child below 7 years is not an offense Section 21 – Act done by a child above 7 but below 12, considering maturity Section 24 – Right of private defense (self-defense provisions) Section 25 – Right of private defense extending to causing death in certain cases Offenses Against the State Section 111 – Waging war against the Government of India Section 113 – Sedition (modified from IPC; now called "acts endangering sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India") Offenses Affecting Public Tranquility ...
Read more

MCQs on Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

-
Here is a set of 20 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) based on the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, focusing on both conceptual understanding and practical application. Each question is followed by an explanation. MCQs on Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 General Principles & Definitions Which of the following is a fundamental principle introduced in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023? a) Rehabilitation-focused punishment b) Community service as an alternative to imprisonment c) Stringent punishment for organized crime and terrorism d) Legalization of certain offenses under previous laws Answer: c) Stringent punishment for organized crime and terrorism Explanation: The BNS 2023 enhances penalties for offenses like terrorism, mob lynching, and organized crime to strengthen national security. Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which term replaces the word ‘offense’ used in IPC, 1860? a) Crime b) Illegality c) Apradh d) Wrongdoing Answer: c) Apradh Explanation: The term...
Read more

The Hon'ble Supreme Court Landmark rulings on Impleadment of Parties (Striking out or adding parties at any stage of a proceeding) necessary and Proper Party Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC, 1908

-
Image
Hon'ble Supreme Court Landmark rulings on Impleadment of Parties (necessary and Proper Party ) order 1 rule 10 of the CPC, 1908  Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. v. Regency Convention Centre , Kasturi v. Iyyamperumal , and Sumtibai v. Paras Finance Co. , focusing on impleadment of parties under Order I Rule 10(2), CPC in specific performance suits . Comparative Case Analysis: Impleadment of Parties in Specific Performance Suits Case Name Key Issue Held Position on Impleadment Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. v. Regency Convention Centre (2010) 7 SCC 417 Can a third party with prospective interest in the suit property be impleaded? ❌ No impleadment A party with only expectation of acquiring interest (not an existing right) is not a proper or necessary party . The plaintiff's choice of whom to sue is respected unless the twin test is met. Kasturi v. Iyyamperumal (2005) 6 SCC 733 Can a person claiming adverse title to both plaintiff and defendant be impleaded? ...
Read more