भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 2023 (Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) -मॉडल प्रश्न (Objective MCQs)

-

भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 2023 (Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) पर आधारित कुछ मॉडल प्रश्न (Model MCQs) — हिंदी माध्यम में, न्यायिक सेवा परीक्षा के लिए उपयोगी:

🔹 मॉडल प्रश्न – भाग 1: प्रारंभिक स्तर (Objective MCQs)

प्रश्न 1. “प्रासंगिक तथ्य” (Relevant Fact) का उल्लेख भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 2023 की किस धारा में किया गया है?
a) धारा 2
b) धारा 3
c) धारा 4
d) धारा 5
उत्तर: d) धारा 5

प्रश्न 2. निम्न में से कौन-सा तथ्य प्रमाण का भार (Burden of Proof) वहन करने हेतु उत्तरदायी होता है?
a) अभियुक्त का
b) प्रतिवादी का
c) जिस पक्ष को कोई तथ्य स्थापित करना है
d) न्यायालय का
उत्तर: c) जिस पक्ष को कोई तथ्य स्थापित करना है

प्रश्न 3. डिजिटल साक्ष्य की स्वीकार्यता के लिए अधिनियम में क्या आवश्यक है?
a) मूल प्रति
b) सील बंद हार्ड ड्राइव
c) प्रमाणन (Certification)
d) फोरेंसिक रिपोर्ट
उत्तर: c) प्रमाणन (Certification)

प्रश्न 4. “स्वीकार्यता का सिद्धांत” किस बात पर आधारित होता है?
a) केवल मौखिक साक्ष्य पर
b) कानून द्वारा परिभाषित प्रासंगिकता पर
c) न्यायालय के विवेक पर
d) अधिवक्ता की याचिका पर
उत्तर: b) कानून द्वारा परिभाषित प्रासंगिकता पर

प्रश्न 5. भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 2023 के अनुसार "इलेक्ट्रॉनिक रिकॉर्ड" में कौन-सा सम्मिलित नहीं है?
a) ई-मेल
b) हार्डकॉपी दस्तावेज़
c) सोशल मीडिया चैट
d) सीसीटीवी फुटेज
उत्तर: b) हार्डकॉपी दस्तावेज़


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can the right to mesne profits be attached in execution of a decree?

-
 A crucial question arises: Can the right to mesne profits be attached in execution of a decree? Yes, the right to mesne profits can be attached and executed under Order 21, Rule 42 of CPC. If a decree is passed for possession along with mesne profits, the decree-holder can apply for execution to recover the mesne profits. However, if mesne profits are unascertained , a separate inquiry under Order 20, Rule 12 of CPC is required to determine the exact amount before execution.
Read more

Brief Outline & Bird’s Eye View of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015

-
  Brief Outline & Bird’s Eye View of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 Objective: This Act provides a comprehensive legal framework for the protection, care, rehabilitation, and justice for children, particularly those in conflict with the law and those in need of care and protection. It aligns with international standards, including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Bird’s Eye View (Key Highlights) Focus on Rehabilitation Over Punishment – Emphasizes reformation and social reintegration of children. Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) – Handles cases of children in conflict with law (juvenile offenders). Child Welfare Committee (CWC) – Looks after children in need of care and protection. Age-based Classification – Below 16 years – Always treated as juveniles. 16–18 years (heinous crimes) – Subject to preliminary assessment and can be tried as adults if necessary. Institutionalization as a Last Resort – Prefe...
Read more

Topic-wise test series on the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 to help you prepare for the Judicial Services Preliminary Examination

-
Topic-wise test series  on the  Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023  to help you prepare for the  Judicial Services Preliminary Examination . 🔍 Topic-Wise MCQs on Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 📌 Topic 1: Relevancy of Facts (Sections 3-50) A is accused of bribing a government official. The prosecution introduces evidence that A had previously bribed another official. Is this admissible? a) Yes, because it establishes a pattern of behavior b) No, because prior misconduct is not relevant c) Yes, but only if the previous act was prosecuted d) No, because character evidence is inadmissible ✅  Answer:   a) Yes, because it establishes a pattern of behavior 🔹  Explanation:  Under  Section 13 , prior similar incidents  may be relevant  if they help prove whether an act was accidental or intentional. A is on trial for theft. The prosecution presents evidence that A was caught committing a similar theft a year ago. Is this admissible? a) ...
Read more